We run short-form clipping as a system — not a volume service. You focus on creating — We handle everything else.
Most clipping fails not because of effort — but because there’s no system behind it. (Personally I would change this to smth else)
Our system works best blah blah blah add some more text here
some sort of casual call to action
come up with some nice text for here. also some more critiscm, the way you phrased these is again a little too technical and words like batch makes it seem like low-effort content farm things, it's giving business plan more so than actually selling it to a potential client it sounds like you're selling it to wesley
We review your long-form content, existing short-form performance, and channel context. Formats, hooks, and constraints are defined upfront, allowing editors to operate with clarity instead of guesswork.
Editors produce clips in structured batches using defined formats. This creates consistency, comparability, and a clean signal for performance evaluation.
Each batch is reviewed against performance and qualitative criteria. Feedback is applied at the system level for formats, pacing, and hooks, and not just individual clips.
We track performance by averages and trends, not outliers. Winning formats are refined, weak ones are adjusted or removed.
Our editors are incentivized for ongoing improvement. The Paska System compounds. Your short-form gets sharper, more predictable, and easier to scale.
Choose how much of short-form you want off your plate. (poor call to action tbh)
your final chance for like a really good call to action think it over